répondre à cette question

aléatoire Question

Are toi for animal testing ou against it?

Pros & Cons
Tell me why, and which side are toi on.

Also what I mean par testing is like medical, like cures for cancer and ect.


*
Thank toi for your answer, this 'll help my research paper nicely. Oh and I can't say I'm for it but I'm not against it.
x-Yumi-x3 posted il y a plus d’un an
*
Meaning I'm for it, but let's not go past animal rights. (common sense. animaux don't have rights)
x-Yumi-x3 posted il y a plus d’un an
*
Do people have rights?
ITF posted il y a plus d’un an
 x-Yumi-x3 posted il y a plus d’un an
next question »

aléatoire Réponses

ITF said:
I am against it 100%
Why:
Because I consider humans and animaux equal.
It is not like one ou two mice will cure cancer, it takes hundreds of animaux to make any progress. Even then, it must be retested many times.
There are many pharmaceutical drugs which had been deemed sûr, sans danger for human use after extensive animal testing, but which were later found to cause serious side effects.
Over 100 million animaux are burned, crippled, poisoned and abused in U.S. labs every year.
Not just mice and rats are used. Shelter chiens and cats, rabbits, apes, monkeys, sheep, and many other animaux are killed in labs, sometimes even people's Lost pets.
Nine out of ten drugs that appear promising in animal studies go on to fail in human clinical trials.
Reliance on animal experimentation can impede and delay discovery.
Forward-thinking scientists have developed humane, modern, and effective non-animal research methods, including human-based microdosing, in vitro technology, human-patient simulators, and sophisticated computer modeling, that are cheaper, faster, and plus accurate than animal tests.
The nourriture and Drug Administration reports that 92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans.
Animal experiments prolong the suffering of people waiting for effective cures par misleading experimenters and squandering precious money, time, and resources that could have been spent on human-relevant research.
The world doesn’t need another eyeliner, hand soap, nourriture ingredient, drug for erectile dysfunction, ou pesticide so badly that it should come at the expense of animals’ lives.
Through taxes, donations, and private funding, Americans have spent almost $200 billion on cancer research since 1971. However, plus than 500,000 Americans die of cancer every year, a 73 percent increase in the death rate since the “war” began.
The only U.S. law that governs the use of animaux in laboratories—the Animal Welfare Act—allows animaux to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, forcibly restrained, addicted to drugs, and brain-damaged. No experiment, no matter how painful ou trivial, is prohibited – and pain-killers are not even required. Even when alternatives to the use of animaux are available, the law does not require that they be used—and often they aren’t. Because the Act specifically excludes rats, mice, birds and cold-blooded animals, plus than 95 percent of the animaux used in laboratories are not subject to the minimal protections provided par federal laws. Because they are not protected par the law, experimenters don’t even have to provide mice and rats with pain relief.



If toi are for it ou not sure, then I suggest toi read Animal Liberation par Peter Singer and toi can save the Animals. These livres tell toi about really happens.
select as best answer
 I am against it 100% Why: Because I consider humans and animaux equal. It is not like one ou two mice will cure cancer, it takes hundreds of animaux to make any progress. Even then, it must be retested many times. There are many pharmaceutical drugs which had been deemed sûr, sans danger for human use after extensive animal testing, but which were later found to cause serious side effects. Over 100 million animaux are burned, crippled, poisoned and abused in U.S. labs every year. Not just mice and rats are used. Shelter chiens and cats, rabbits, apes, monkeys, sheep, and many other animaux are killed in labs, sometimes even people's Lost pets. Nine out of ten drugs that appear promising in animal studies go on to fail in human clinical trials. Reliance on animal experimentation can impede and delay discovery. Forward-thinking scientists have developed humane, modern, and effective non-animal research methods, including human-based microdosing, in vitro technology, human-patient simulators, and sophisticated computer modeling, that are cheaper, faster, and plus accurate than animal tests. The nourriture and Drug Administration reports that 92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans. Animal experiments prolong the suffering of people waiting for effective cures par misleading experimenters and squandering precious money, time, and resources that could have been spent on human-relevant research. The world doesn’t need another eyeliner, hand soap, nourriture ingredient, drug for erectile dysfunction, ou pesticide so badly that it should come at the expense of animals’ lives. Through taxes, donations, and private funding, Americans have spent almost $200 billion on cancer research since 1971. However, plus than 500,000 Americans die of cancer every year, a 73 percent increase in the death rate since the “war” began. The only U.S. law that governs the use of animaux in laboratories—the Animal Welfare Act—allows animaux to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, forcibly restrained, addicted to drugs, and brain-damaged. No experiment, no matter how painful ou trivial, is prohibited – and pain-killers are not even required. Even when alternatives to the use of animaux are available, the law does not require that they be used—and often they aren’t. Because the Act specifically excludes rats, mice, birds and cold-blooded animals, plus than 95 percent of the animaux used in laboratories are not subject to the minimal protections provided par federal laws. Because they are not protected par the law, experimenters don’t even have to provide mice and rats with pain relief. If toi are for it ou not sure, then I suggest toi read Animal Liberation par Peter Singer and toi can save the Animals. These livres tell toi about really happens.
posted il y a plus d’un an 
*
your very first statement after the "why" kinda Lost my vote...
True-Finn-Fan posted il y a plus d’un an
*
also, it appears that toi used the same information structure as on the AAVS (Animal Anti-Vivisection Society)'s website article i read. in fact, it's almost identical, although plus explained in the article.
True-Finn-Fan posted il y a plus d’un an
*
Answer my question first. Would toi kill a child to save your family? But what does this have to do with animal testing? Like I a dit above, one souris would not cure anyone. Everything must be retested many times and hundreds of animaux die to make any progress. And not just die, they are killed in very painful ways.
ITF posted il y a plus d’un an
KohakuJSMA said:
I am not for that.
It is very mean, and inhumane. >:C
select as best answer
posted il y a plus d’un an 
sieluvzsoul said:
AGAINST IT!!! ALL THE WAY!!
select as best answer
posted il y a plus d’un an 
*
Good for you!
ITF posted il y a plus d’un an
egyptprincess7 said:
I'm really on the neutral side. I mean it could help society but it could also seriously harm those poor animals.
select as best answer
posted il y a plus d’un an 
Makeupdiva said:
I guess I am half and half, neutral.

If it can help keep people alive from cerain diseases, cancers, etc. There probably isn't really another way to test those on. I don't really agree with it though because animaux have lives like we do.

I definitely don't agree with testing cosmetics, hair products, accueil cleaning products, etc. on animals, it's just so wrong and it should be band. However, they are trying to ban in in the US and Canada, but they do test on animaux in Japon which I just don't agree with.

I'm not good at explaining exactly how I feel on these sort of topics. So, I'm just saying, I am half and half.
select as best answer
posted il y a plus d’un an 
frostedgirl1 said:
178%
Against it!!!
I hate hate hate it!
select as best answer
posted il y a plus d’un an 
BlondLionEzel said:
Pros:

If it's medicine for an animal, they do need to make sure it works.

Cons:

Do toi really need to use them to test Cosmetics? Really?
select as best answer
posted il y a plus d’un an 
*
I agree.
x-Yumi-x3 posted il y a plus d’un an
summer2987 said:

I put my face up to the clear glass object, inhaling and exhaling leaving my hands par my sides. "No," I whispered,"this can't be," I repeated. I had Lost hope, my insides turning inside out. I will not let it end here, I will not allow this to turn to dust. I slowly put my fingers to the knob, slowly opening the door and feeling the burst of air hit my face."I will not let this happen," I have donné up all means of life, it was impossible. What had happens happened. I was not the supreme ruler, there was nothing I could not rule over, I looked inside of the object and put my hand through the darkness and felt something hard yet soft. I pulled it out, and muttered one word before I fell into oblivion,"egg."
select as best answer
posted il y a plus d’un an 
*
?
ITF posted il y a plus d’un an
AnimeFan66 said:
I'm against animal testing in all matters and forms.

Because I myself am a pure lover of ALL animaux and species worldwide. I have been sense I was a little boy. After lire articles and hearing stories about how they were captured, abused, and killed it just drove me to madness. I couldn't ours the thought of elephants getting poached for ivory ou rhinos for their horns. Even the Great Apes of Africa and Asia are facing threats because of illegal logging and the use of palm oil. :( It's depressing to me.

Whatever ya'll have to say about it is your perspective. But I'm against any form of animal cruelty, testing, etc.
select as best answer
 I'm against animal testing in all matters and forms. Because I myself am a pure lover of ALL animaux and species worldwide. I have been sense I was a little boy. After lire articles and hearing stories about how they were captured, abused, and killed it just drove me to madness. I couldn't ours the thought of elephants getting poached for ivory ou rhinos for their horns. Even the Great Apes of Africa and Asia are facing threats because of illegal logging and the use of palm oil. :( It's depressing to me. Whatever ya'll have to say about it is your perspective. But I'm against any form of animal cruelty, testing, etc.
posted il y a plus d’un an 
next question »