Hunger Games

répondre à cette question

Hunger Games Question

A question was added.

MDR sorry for the titre when toi clicked on it.
Here's my question.
Would toi agree with Katniss and everyone else who wanted there to be Hunger Games for the Capitol children? Why ou why not?
Personally, I disagree with Katniss because I believe Peeta was right. That's what they were fighting against in the first place. And the Capitol children were innocent; they grew up the way they did and didn't know any better.
So what would've been your choice? Would toi have issued the Capitol Hunger Games ou no?
 icuSTALKER posted il y a plus d’un an
next question »

Hunger Games Réponses

stlouisfan said:
Maybe once to montrer the Capitol what it's like seeing your children being put into an arena and forced to kill each other. montrer them what it's like to see their own inoccent blood being spilt all for entertainment. Eye for an eye sorry to say.
 select as best answer
posted il y a plus d’un an 
hollistergurl said:
NO, I am totally against that idea!
You're right, it was why they were fighting-- this punishment led to all this fighting, and it's not right to treat the children this way. They're just innocent children, just like all the kids in the Districts... they were just brought up differently, but that doesn't mean they should fight to the death.
I would never issue the Capitol Hunger Games, because the whole idea is just sick-- why create a duplicate of the Hunger Games with Capitol children?
 select as best answer
posted il y a plus d’un an 
*
agreed
izbia150 posted il y a plus d’un an
silver93 said:
I don't think Katniss ever intended to let there be a Hunger Games with Capitol children, she just agreed to get the oppurtunity to kill Coin. par then, she realized that Coin was the exact same as Snow, and the only way to handle it, was par taking her out.
 select as best answer
posted il y a plus d’un an 
*
Very true.
Pumpkin_Pie posted il y a plus d’un an
Face_of_Music said:
Well, I guess that I can see ot from both sides. LOADS of 12-18 yr olds died cuz of THG, and I'd want revenge and want the capitol to feel pain, but I just fought to STOP that, so i'd go with stoping it all together
 select as best answer
posted il y a plus d’un an 
MomoThePuppy said:
No, I don't agree at all. That's what they were fighting against, were the Hunger Games and the Capitol. It pissed me off when Katniss agreed that it should happen. Why? For what? So toi could look just as bad as Pres. Snow did?
select as best answer
posted il y a plus d’un an 
izbia150 said:
No.

It's just like putting the district children in the Hunger Games.
 select as best answer
No. It's just like putting the district children in the Hunger Games.
posted il y a plus d’un an 
Flickerflame said:
No. Definitely no.

I could see the revenge appeal of putting Snow and the gamemakers in themselves. But their children and grandchildren? Those kids have nothing to do with the games except for an accident of birth! Just because they've been lucky enough to be exempt from the Reapings before doesn't mean they should be punished now. Also, if the Capitol ever regained power, the Capitol Games would increase the risk of the old Hunger Games being reinstated.
 select as best answer
posted il y a plus d’un an 
next question »
Cookies help us bring you Fanpop. By using Fanpop, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More Got It!