Deadliest Warrior Club
rejoindre
Fanpop
New Post
Explore Fanpop
toi know how they make up these matches randomly some of them are toaly unfair for example the ninja vs spartan how can toi compair someone who was trained to fight in the night against some one who was trained since the age of 3 and if they werent good enough they were killed u got to be kidding me how is that fair at all.And then Aztec against the Zande how can u compair the Zande to the aztec if the Zande had steel and the aztec only had Bones how is that considered fair correct me if im wrong but the aztecs were around and in their prime around 1502 the zande are still around and they had a mix of steel and broze against the aztecs Bones and stones explain too me how that is fair????? i bet that in season three on wednesday there will be a bunch of unfair matches for one thing i hope there will not be any unfair matches please put commentaires if u agree ou disagree thank u for your time and goodbye fellow deadlist warrior fans
posted by elco8283
ok, so obviously for anyone who is a fan of this website, toi agree it kicks ass. but there are a couple of things wrong with the show. to be specific, two of the episodes (first season). the first- and most stupid- the fight between the apache and the gladiator. the gladiator should have won. and i'm not just saying that because i don't like native american history as much as Roman history, i am saying it because it is wrong. the main tactic for the apache is to get in, kill, and run out. they RUN AWAY. if toi didn't pick up on the emphasis of RUN AWAY, par the words being in capitals, i put...
continue reading...