Internet joke critcizing Bella's adoration of Edward's stalking
Twilight is often derisively referred to as porn for tweens, and I think this is fairly accurate but shouldn’t be thought of in a bad way for that. I believe Stephenie Meyer has a dit that she wrote Twilight for adults and that her publisher marketed it to the teenage readership, probably because of its sexual theme but lack of explicit sex. Even without its explicit sex, I think Twilight is very much a sexual fantaisie tying themes of domination and submission common to vampire romances to the sexually-charged teenage years when the most basic exploration of one’s sexuality is powerful. This understandably speaks to the readership of girls as well as women who remember those years. It is porn in a way not commonly performed in such a way that it appeals to a young female mind, which I think is a good thing. Sexuality should be explored safely, and lire fictional literature (and écriture fanfiction) is a sûr, sans danger way to play with fantasies. I think it’s in the interest of feminism that girls are able to do this and the success of Twilight in a way speaks to the progress of society. It’s when Twilight leaves the level of fantaisie and girls start considering Edward and Jacob good boyfriends that there’s a problem, though, because when toi come right down to it they are abusive.
Edward is very abusive and to a lesser extent Jacob is too. Edward has an unhealthy controlling personality and Jacob seems to think it’s okay to force a Kiss if it’s for the sake of romance. I could go into greater detail, but it’s already been done par people plus dedicated than me. Check out “link” par Cinders and the video series “link” par fromthisgirl. As a Twilight fan, I have a negative reaction to strong words like “abusive” and “stalker”, but it’s important to analyze the book from a neutral perspective and detach personal feelings from the issue. Saying Edward’s a stalker isn’t the same as saying “…and you’re evil for liking him!” Now, some antis do make it personal, saying stuff like “Edward sucks, Twilight sucks, and should hate it too if toi don’t want to suck”, and that’s not cool… but not all antis are just rude haters. There is a point to what the feminism-aligned antis are saying when they criticize the characters, which should be recognized.
When Twihards take the fantaisie of Edward and make it into a standard par which to judge boys to see if they’re boyfriend material, that’s a problem. Edward is not good boyfriend material. Edward is a fantaisie based on classic sexist notions of romantic ideals, mixed with vampire rape fantasies. This is something that works on the level of fantaisie but is disastrous in real life. When toi start wanting a boy to stalk toi in real life, that’s a problem. When toi start excusing what amounts to sexual assault, that’s a problem. Feminism has fought to let women be treated as equals, to be shown the same level of respect as men, and not just treated as submissive nonpersons. Do not dishonor feminists par embracing a lack of self-respect! Boys who treat their girlfriends like they’re people are good people and should be respected as good (or potentially good) boyfriend material, not disregarded because they don’t live up to sexist ideals embodied in an abusive, stalking caricature used as the object of desire in an unrealistic sexual fantasy.
It’s important to compartmentalize Edward as only the object of desire in a sexual fantaisie in which he is honored, and to understand that in real life he would be a horrible person who link. Within the context of Twilight as a fantasy, it’s fine to l’amour Edward as the strong, controlling character he is. Some of us—whether due to socialization ou bodily makeup—just like the idea of a partner being this dominating figure. Bella has very little characterization, so she’s an easy vessel to fill and imagine oneself being dominated par this powerful man who has the ability to kill you, who wants to on some level, but never will because he likes you. That’s very attractive to a lot of women and is fine in the level of fantasy. In real life, Edward would be like the villain of a Lifetime original movie, which creep me out so bad.
A lot of feminist antis go a step farther than I do and say that the fantasizing about Edward is problematic in and of itself, and that women shouldn’t have submissive fantasies at all, but I disagree. Some of us are just wired to enjoy those kinds of fantasies. The stigmatization of women who embrace their submissive side within the context of a fantasy is undeserved and seems like classic discriminatory grouping behavior where only the in-group are truly respected. The difference between embracing submission in a fantastical situation and in real life is the element of control. toi always have control over a fantaisie and can just put the book down if you’re not into it. It’s the people who surrender control who are in real trouble and are the real victims. Note that I don’t mean people in healthy BDSM (bondage and discipline, domination and submission, sadism and masochism; I’m aware that’s too many letters) relationships, because in them the submissive person has a safeword to stop all activity whereas unhealthy, abusive relationships give the submissive person no control over the relationship. Twilight can be considered as like a BDSM fantaisie where the fan can safeword out par putting down the book, but Bella has no safeword because she’s a character in the fantaisie and not a real person.
To conclude, Edward and Jacob are dominating objects of desire in what amounts to a sexual fantasy, and shouldn’t be considered good role mannequins for real life boyfriends. In real life, they would be the worst kinds of people with whom to get involved in a serious romantic relationship. However, if toi can keep them compartmentalized as only sex objects in an unrealistic fantasy, there’s nothing wrong with loving them. vampires and loups garous have long been metaphors for dark expression of sexuality, and Twilight is just one plus in a long series of Supernatural rape fantasies. Exploration of sexuality, even dark and dangerous, is perfectly healthy as long as the dangerous stuff is kept at the level of fantaisie and toi always keep the control toi deserve as a human being.
10. Beg him not to eat you.
9. Inform him that he seems to be the “depressed” Cullen.
8. Go up to him, look him in the eye and ask if he is hungry.
7. Spell his name with two “a”’s (Jaspar) and call him Jaspar Cullen. When he objects, saying his name is Jasper Hale, wave your hand at him and tell him all that blood must have gone to his brain.
6. Tell him only girls feel emotions. Then giggle and run away.
5. Dress up in a cape and fangs and leap out in front of him when he is least expecting it, proclaiming toi have come to suck his blood.
4. Send out waves of lust and see how he reacts.
3. When he gets too close made your fingers into the sign of the traverser, croix and cry, “The power of Christ compels you!”.
2. Splatter red paint all over his and Alice’s room and videotape his reaction.
And the Number One way to annoy Jasper Hale?
1. Whenever he says anything, snap to attention, shout “Sir, yes sir!” and salute, army style.
9. Inform him that he seems to be the “depressed” Cullen.
8. Go up to him, look him in the eye and ask if he is hungry.
7. Spell his name with two “a”’s (Jaspar) and call him Jaspar Cullen. When he objects, saying his name is Jasper Hale, wave your hand at him and tell him all that blood must have gone to his brain.
6. Tell him only girls feel emotions. Then giggle and run away.
5. Dress up in a cape and fangs and leap out in front of him when he is least expecting it, proclaiming toi have come to suck his blood.
4. Send out waves of lust and see how he reacts.
3. When he gets too close made your fingers into the sign of the traverser, croix and cry, “The power of Christ compels you!”.
2. Splatter red paint all over his and Alice’s room and videotape his reaction.
And the Number One way to annoy Jasper Hale?
1. Whenever he says anything, snap to attention, shout “Sir, yes sir!” and salute, army style.
