One thing I've noticed in general is that anti's tend to make a pretty big deal out of the Twilight vampires sparkling. I've seen people saying things like real vampires don't sparkle, vampires not sparkling was a fact, and that it was gay of them to sparkle. Okay, of ALL the things to criticize in Twilight, people are going after the SPARKLING? Seriously?
First off, at least where I'm from, calling something “gay” as an insult is considered really rude and distasteful. Besides being rude and homophobic, it's also generalizing and stereotyping. Just because something sparkles doesn't make it gay. I don’t know how anyone else feels about this, but I personally hate it when people use that as an insult. To me, it just makes the person saying it look bad, not the vampire in question they’re trying to insult.
Next, vampires don't exist, so toi can't say for certain whether they sparkle ou not. Saying that vampires don't sparkle is merely an opinion, not a fact, and par definition, an opinion is neither right nor wrong.
I've also heard people saying that Stephenie Meyer ruined vampires, and they seem to insist that "real" vampires are like Dracula. I've read and heard of a lot of other livres where the authors have changed vampires, such as the House of Night Series, The Cirque Du Freak Series, etc., but I've never come across someone complaining about how they changed vampires, ou complaining that they ruined vampires. From what I’ve seen, people can and will always find something to hate about almost anything, and people making such a big deal out of the MeyerPires sparkling seems as though they’re just looking for something to hate, I mean if she'd made her vampires plus traditional, people would probably be complaining/accusing that she'd ripped off Bram Stoker.
Even if toi don't like what Stephenie Meyer did with vampires, at least she came up with something new and somewhat creative. I mean, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and it’s fine if toi dislike the sparkling, and I’m not trying to change that, but it just seems like such a petty thing to make such a huge deal over.
First off, at least where I'm from, calling something “gay” as an insult is considered really rude and distasteful. Besides being rude and homophobic, it's also generalizing and stereotyping. Just because something sparkles doesn't make it gay. I don’t know how anyone else feels about this, but I personally hate it when people use that as an insult. To me, it just makes the person saying it look bad, not the vampire in question they’re trying to insult.
Next, vampires don't exist, so toi can't say for certain whether they sparkle ou not. Saying that vampires don't sparkle is merely an opinion, not a fact, and par definition, an opinion is neither right nor wrong.
I've also heard people saying that Stephenie Meyer ruined vampires, and they seem to insist that "real" vampires are like Dracula. I've read and heard of a lot of other livres where the authors have changed vampires, such as the House of Night Series, The Cirque Du Freak Series, etc., but I've never come across someone complaining about how they changed vampires, ou complaining that they ruined vampires. From what I’ve seen, people can and will always find something to hate about almost anything, and people making such a big deal out of the MeyerPires sparkling seems as though they’re just looking for something to hate, I mean if she'd made her vampires plus traditional, people would probably be complaining/accusing that she'd ripped off Bram Stoker.
Even if toi don't like what Stephenie Meyer did with vampires, at least she came up with something new and somewhat creative. I mean, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and it’s fine if toi dislike the sparkling, and I’m not trying to change that, but it just seems like such a petty thing to make such a huge deal over.
These are tatouages of girls who are over-the-top obsessed about Twilight. Click on the liens to see them.
link
link
Are these people kidding themselves? The worst is the Edward Cullen/Robert Pattinson one. Ugh!
I was horrified par looking at them. It's one thing to be a part of a fad but it's a whole different thing to make that fad a part of your body.
What is the world coming to? Tomorrow when these girls go to get these horrors removed they'll probably be spending a lot plus than they spent paying to get it done.
link
link
Are these people kidding themselves? The worst is the Edward Cullen/Robert Pattinson one. Ugh!
I was horrified par looking at them. It's one thing to be a part of a fad but it's a whole different thing to make that fad a part of your body.
What is the world coming to? Tomorrow when these girls go to get these horrors removed they'll probably be spending a lot plus than they spent paying to get it done.
Well i think that it's quite obvious that HARRY POTTER has plus fans than twilight. Cause some people might not of heard of twilight before. I also think that people would like HARRY POTTER better because....
there is plus action and killing
some people might like wizards better
the weasley brothers are funny
I think people would like TWILIGHT because....
there is plus love
some people might like vampires better
it's a great story
I don't have a favourite because i l’amour HARRY POTTER and i l’amour TWILIGHT.HARRY POTTER and TWILIGHT are amazing.
By, Mysticfallstown xxx
there is plus action and killing
some people might like wizards better
the weasley brothers are funny
I think people would like TWILIGHT because....
there is plus love
some people might like vampires better
it's a great story
I don't have a favourite because i l’amour HARRY POTTER and i l’amour TWILIGHT.HARRY POTTER and TWILIGHT are amazing.
By, Mysticfallstown xxx