Harry Potter vs Twilight Club
rejoindre
Fanpop
New Post
Explore Fanpop
1.Ginny is a perfect character (“Mary Sue”), which Rowling hides par calling her temperamental.
2. Being temperamental is not a flaw if everyone thinks it’s cute and adorable and it gets toi a boyfriend.
3. NOBODY can do anything productive without magic.
4. Ginny runs after a train like an idiot even though this isn’t her first time watching the train leave with her brothers. Obviously she’s watch the train leave EVERY SINGLE an OF HER LIFE.
5. Rowling is living out her own fantasies through Hermione, who is clearly herself.
6. The livres aren’t well written, just because toi make up...
continue reading...
added by youknowit101
Source: drappleluv.tumblr
added by youknowit101
Source: drappleluv.tumblr
added by youknowit101
Source: iiloverrrkristenstew@tumblr
added by youknowit101
Source: pubsub
added by narniafreak12
Source: failbook
added by BellaLovett
added by Gred_and_Forge
Source: Tumblr
added by Gred_and_Forge
Source: Tumblr
added by KateKicksAss
added by Gred_and_Forge
Source: Tumblr
added by harrypotterbest
(i have edited this article so there r no spelling mistakes :) )

Hello everyone, today I'm going to tell toi why Twilight is a BILLION times better than the Harry Potter. Here are some reasons.

1. First, they are no swear words!! I mean I heard in Hp they is swearing, like "h*ll" and "b*tch" I mean little kids are lire that!! Like 7 and 8 years olds!! It's crazy!!!111 In Twilight, there is no swearing beacuse it is a child sûr, sans danger book :)

2. HP is for kids only!! I mean Twilight is for all ages!!! I haven't read HP but I know only little kids read it!! Twilight is for everyone, my 10 an old...
continue reading...
Taking arms against Harry Potter, at this moment, is to emulate Hamlet taking arms against a sea of troubles. par opposing the sea, toi won't end it. The Harry Potter epiphenomenon will go on, doubtless for some time, as J. R. R. Tolkien did, and then wane.

The official newspaper of our dominant counter-culture, The New York Times, has been startled par the Potter livres into establishing a new policy for its not very literate book review. Rather than crowd out the Grishams, Clancys, Crichtons, Kings, and other vastly populaire prose fictions on its fiction bestseller list, the Potter volumes will...
continue reading...
added by frankthe2nd
Source: tumblr