répondre à cette question

aléatoire Question

How far would toi go to prove a point?

 How far would toi go to prove a point?
 JetBlack_ posted il y a plus d’un an
next question »

aléatoire Réponses

BlindBandit92 said:
Whatever is necessary and whatever fits the current situation.
select as best answer
posted il y a plus d’un an 
wantadog said:
I've been known to go to excessives to prove myself right.
select as best answer
posted il y a plus d’un an 
zanhar1 said:
Extremely.
I'm almost dangerously stubborn.
select as best answer
posted il y a plus d’un an 
CokeTheUmbreon said:
Depends.
select as best answer
posted il y a plus d’un an 
Mauserfan1910 said:
Usually to pubmed ou some other reputable scientific journal

select as best answer
posted il y a plus d’un an 
TheLefteris24 said:
Honestly, if toi asked me on the past, I would have a dit extremely since I used to be quite Stubborn. Well, I still am. Just not as much as I used to XD Now, it depends on the occasion. When it comes to proving something not only for my sake but for others as well ou when a Subject I strongly feel about gets involved, I'll go as much as I can, providing anything necessary. If it's about most kinds of arguments which prove to be pointless in the end, I'll simply state my stance on the matter and reasons for it. If people still have an issue with that, I couldn't care less. I don't mind getting into plus detail ou explaining further for those who might not get what I have a dit at first but I won't spend time to amplify my statements to those who simply dismiss them. Leaving a conversation ou not replying back doesn't mean accepting what another has told you. It is just pretty tiring to deal with a person who is hooked in disagreeing with toi just for the sake of it which happens pretty often. Quite draining really. That being said, I can admit when I'm wrong and follow another's point if it's reasonable. Continuing the argument feels meaningless otherwise. A conversation is about everyone participating in it to have learnt something at the end of it and not about someone coming out on top. I find the realization of the first to be respectable in a person and the later to be a pretty stupid and an immature way of thinking. Cooperation is key. If toi don't have that, there's no point in bothering !!!!
select as best answer
 Honestly, if toi asked me on the past, I would have a dit extremely since I used to be quite Stubborn. Well, I still am. Just not as much as I used to XD Now, it depends on the occasion. When it comes to proving something not only for my sake but for others as well ou when a Subject I strongly feel about gets involved, I'll go as much as I can, providing anything necessary. If it's about most kinds of arguments which prove to be pointless in the end, I'll simply state my stance on the matter and reasons for it. If people still have an issue with that, I couldn't care less. I don't mind getting into plus detail ou explaining further for those who might not get what I have a dit at first but I won't spend time to amplify my statements to those who simply dismiss them. Leaving a conversation ou not replying back doesn't mean accepting what another has told you. It is just pretty tiring to deal with a person who is hooked in disagreeing with toi just for the sake of it which happens pretty often. Quite draining really. That being said, I can admit when I'm wrong and follow another's point if it's reasonable. Continuing the argument feels meaningless otherwise. A conversation is about everyone participating in it to have learnt something at the end of it and not about someone coming out on top. I find the realization of the first to be respectable in a person and the later to be a pretty stupid and an immature way of thinking. Cooperation is key. If toi don't have that, there's no point in bothering !!!!
posted il y a plus d’un an 
next question »