posted by estudioso
Alright I just went through the Rolling Stone's liste of the 100 Greatest artists of all time and Paul wasn't in there. That is appalling. Statistically he should be in the haut, retour au début five. It is an outrage. Why would Rolling Stone do something like that. John Lennon made it and he only did a few albums. My theory is that the panel Rolling Stone assembled to make the liste is incompetent, which is shown par that mistake as well as many numerous other wrong and weird rankings. Also, I have heard that Rolling Stone magazine never really liked Paul McCartney and never took his musique history, but still he should have been on that list.
posted by thrillergirl18
Well Paulie's getting married again it's in the paper. I just hope that this one is better then the other ones he had. But what I truly think is that Paul should just be single for a while I mean I l’amour Paul but. He has been abused and got cheated on before. I don't know what her this women's name is but like what I a dit before I just really do hope that she's kind and gentle. I heard that his first wife wasn't that great in fact I heard that neither of The Beatles wife's were abusive. I did heard that Patti Boyd cheated on George for Eric Clapton and sh also had hitted him and so on.