No, this is not fan fiction. I was recently asked if Lost would find a whole new fan-base in light of a a heavily promoted re-run currently montrer on G4. The question seemed easy enough. It's a simple yes ou no answer, right? Well, not quite.
As with everything to do with Lost, there are no simple réponses - and most réponses simply lead to plus questions anyway. I've been in the TV / Media industry long enough to know how cyclical these things are. The fact it's on G4 means it's being exposed to a new younger (mostly male) audience.
But Lost - par its nature - has a couple of very major roadblocks when it comes to finding new fans.
The first is a requirement for dedication. Proper, all-consuming, diligent dedication. Casual viewing will simply not suffice. The seconde is intelligence. I don't mean a high IQ. I mean the ability to think well beyond what's presented to us on the screen and connect (often invisible) dots and transcending the seemingly esoteric nature of the writing. Anyone just watching and not going above and beyond (be that online, lire books, researching etc) will very quickly become Lost and I'd be surprised if any of these people make it beyond the third season.
Lost viewers (whether they're prepared ou not), will also embark on a very challenging and sometimes deeply personal journey. This isn't just any montrer which is why there's never been one like it before, nor will there be for some time to come.
To fully appreciate it, Lost needs to be watched par the kind of person that understands that when Jacob says...
“I didn't pluck any of toi out of a happy existence. toi were all flawed. I chose toi because toi were like me. toi were all alone. toi were all looking for something that toi couldn't find out there. I chose toi because toi needed this place as much as it needed you.”
... he's not just talking to Jack, Kate, Sawyer and Hurley. This was a meta reference directed at every one of us. Anyone who'd stuck with Lost up until that episode (the seconde last of the series) would almost definitely have found resonance in those words for their personal life journeys - and recognised the deliberate dual intentions of the speech.
In that moment, the writers (through Jacob's words) reached out into the audience, grabbed us par the shoulders and reminded us why it is we are such big fans. After all we'd dedicated a great deal of our time and resources to this program. par any definition, a TV montrer that's capable of a feat such as this is uniquely and miraculously special.
The characters were not randomly made up from thin air. They were carefully, delicately and dare I say, brilliantly crafted into characters that (love ou hate them), had bits of us all in them. We related to them so well in fact, many of us even hated the hero - not because he annoyed us (though he did), but because we knew we shared some his flaws. It may not have been obvious on a first watch, but quickly became so on subsequent viewings.
Oddly enough, it's this very formula that has us still talking about the montrer so long after it left our screens. We're all still discovering things about Lost - almost on a daily basis and that's because it was so narratively rich and inextricably complex. These are the things that (at times) had me pulling my hair out when I didn't know what the hell was going on. But being literally and metaphorically Lost is part and parcel of this journey and why it's still so relevant after all these years.
The point here is that I wonder exactly how a mass resurgence of this montrer can work without a widespread campaign of some sort that 'frames' Lost to new viewers. One that's careful not to give anything away that would ruin the experience. A documentary perhaps that re-aligns the Zeitgeist, that ignites a new sense of wonder about the montrer to those who've only heard about it - ou caught a few episodes and thought "WTF" before quickly giving up.
All this is indeed very possible. It just needs the right timing and the right team to put the effort into getting a whole new generation caught in the net and appreciate the montrer we all know is the best there's ever been.
As with everything to do with Lost, there are no simple réponses - and most réponses simply lead to plus questions anyway. I've been in the TV / Media industry long enough to know how cyclical these things are. The fact it's on G4 means it's being exposed to a new younger (mostly male) audience.
But Lost - par its nature - has a couple of very major roadblocks when it comes to finding new fans.
The first is a requirement for dedication. Proper, all-consuming, diligent dedication. Casual viewing will simply not suffice. The seconde is intelligence. I don't mean a high IQ. I mean the ability to think well beyond what's presented to us on the screen and connect (often invisible) dots and transcending the seemingly esoteric nature of the writing. Anyone just watching and not going above and beyond (be that online, lire books, researching etc) will very quickly become Lost and I'd be surprised if any of these people make it beyond the third season.
Lost viewers (whether they're prepared ou not), will also embark on a very challenging and sometimes deeply personal journey. This isn't just any montrer which is why there's never been one like it before, nor will there be for some time to come.
To fully appreciate it, Lost needs to be watched par the kind of person that understands that when Jacob says...
“I didn't pluck any of toi out of a happy existence. toi were all flawed. I chose toi because toi were like me. toi were all alone. toi were all looking for something that toi couldn't find out there. I chose toi because toi needed this place as much as it needed you.”
... he's not just talking to Jack, Kate, Sawyer and Hurley. This was a meta reference directed at every one of us. Anyone who'd stuck with Lost up until that episode (the seconde last of the series) would almost definitely have found resonance in those words for their personal life journeys - and recognised the deliberate dual intentions of the speech.
In that moment, the writers (through Jacob's words) reached out into the audience, grabbed us par the shoulders and reminded us why it is we are such big fans. After all we'd dedicated a great deal of our time and resources to this program. par any definition, a TV montrer that's capable of a feat such as this is uniquely and miraculously special.
The characters were not randomly made up from thin air. They were carefully, delicately and dare I say, brilliantly crafted into characters that (love ou hate them), had bits of us all in them. We related to them so well in fact, many of us even hated the hero - not because he annoyed us (though he did), but because we knew we shared some his flaws. It may not have been obvious on a first watch, but quickly became so on subsequent viewings.
Oddly enough, it's this very formula that has us still talking about the montrer so long after it left our screens. We're all still discovering things about Lost - almost on a daily basis and that's because it was so narratively rich and inextricably complex. These are the things that (at times) had me pulling my hair out when I didn't know what the hell was going on. But being literally and metaphorically Lost is part and parcel of this journey and why it's still so relevant after all these years.
The point here is that I wonder exactly how a mass resurgence of this montrer can work without a widespread campaign of some sort that 'frames' Lost to new viewers. One that's careful not to give anything away that would ruin the experience. A documentary perhaps that re-aligns the Zeitgeist, that ignites a new sense of wonder about the montrer to those who've only heard about it - ou caught a few episodes and thought "WTF" before quickly giving up.
All this is indeed very possible. It just needs the right timing and the right team to put the effort into getting a whole new generation caught in the net and appreciate the montrer we all know is the best there's ever been.
This is my theory of what the smoke monster is based on the last episode "Dead is dead".
If toi have noticed par now Lost has lots of things from egypt in it, which made me think about the monster.
In the last episode when Ben went to be judged we see the image on the wall. Its Anubis bowing beofore a snake like creature in Egypt this was called "Apep the snake". Apep was the protector and one of the Egyption "Monsters". Apep was enemys with Ra the sun god.
Eygptions beleived chats where sacred and killing one was punishable par death. They even mourned their passing par shaving theoir eyebrows, now is it just me ou did Ben have a like of eyebrows in "Dead is Dead"? Maybe Ben was mourning the passing of Locke this way ou even Alex. Somkey however told Ben if he tried to kill Locke then he would be killed, maybe Locke represents the cat.
If toi have noticed par now Lost has lots of things from egypt in it, which made me think about the monster.
In the last episode when Ben went to be judged we see the image on the wall. Its Anubis bowing beofore a snake like creature in Egypt this was called "Apep the snake". Apep was the protector and one of the Egyption "Monsters". Apep was enemys with Ra the sun god.
Eygptions beleived chats where sacred and killing one was punishable par death. They even mourned their passing par shaving theoir eyebrows, now is it just me ou did Ben have a like of eyebrows in "Dead is Dead"? Maybe Ben was mourning the passing of Locke this way ou even Alex. Somkey however told Ben if he tried to kill Locke then he would be killed, maybe Locke represents the cat.
As all of toi know when Ben turned the La Reine des Neiges donkey wheel he was banished from the island and was moved 10 months in the future.
Then many theories were pointing to where did the island go well here's mine:
toi Can see in the promo that there were strange
people Carrying WW1 pistolets and WW1 Clothes [Correct me if I am wrong] then maybe the island moved 90 years in the past and to wherever the WW1 Took place .
Now... if that is correct then Ben is only trying to return to the island himself par convincing Jack that it happened "Because he Left" and he has to go back.
If I am Right Then he probably killed "Jeremy Bentham" to prevent him from Telling the truth.
This is my theory Don't forget the commentaires good ou bad Don't forget it.
Then many theories were pointing to where did the island go well here's mine:
toi Can see in the promo that there were strange
people Carrying WW1 pistolets and WW1 Clothes [Correct me if I am wrong] then maybe the island moved 90 years in the past and to wherever the WW1 Took place .
Now... if that is correct then Ben is only trying to return to the island himself par convincing Jack that it happened "Because he Left" and he has to go back.
If I am Right Then he probably killed "Jeremy Bentham" to prevent him from Telling the truth.
This is my theory Don't forget the commentaires good ou bad Don't forget it.