Q: Harry Potter is the best! What are they going to call Book Four? A: "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire."
Q: "The Goblin of Fire?" Cool! A: No, Goblet.
Q: Goblet? Like a cup? A: Yes.
Q: Ugh. Could that be any plus sucky? A: It could have been "Harry Potter and the Phantom Menace."
Q: So what's it about? A: No one knows. auteur J.K. Rowling didn’t want to spoil the element of surprise, which she feels is essential to creating the childlike wonderment one feels when encountering Harry’s world, as well as a key component of the massive marketing offensive required to sell the unprecedented 3.8...
Slytherins are evil. Gryffindors are perfect. Ravenclaws just study. Hufflepuffs are useless.
I think we have all established that those are all completely untrue. This is called "stereotyping" and it is BAD. It tosses groups of people together and sticks a label on the lot of them, no matter that they're not all exactly the same.
This happens all the time, whether it be stereotyping par house, skin colour, gender, ou blood "purity".
Think of it this way...
Purebloods have discriminated against muggleborns for centuries. It's something that has never changed and probably never will. All purebloods,...
Knock knock? Who's there? You Know. You-Know-Who? That's right!Avada Kedavra!
How do toi keep a Gryffindor in suspense? *walk away*
How many weasley's does it take to light up a wand? Seven: Ginny to look upset and do nothing, Ron to sulk, Fred and George to blow it up, Percy to yell, Charlie to hold it in front of a dragon and Bill to roll his eyes at everyone.
How many Dark Lords does it take to light up a wand? Two: One to light it and the other to kill him and take the credit.
How many Voldemorts does it take to light up a wand? None, now toi see thats why he's called the DARK lord.