Agnosticism
What do you think? Place your vote!
(Placed your vote already? Remember to login!)
Agnosticism Do toi consider yourself an agnostic theist ou an agnostic atheist?
55 fans picked: |
Agnostic theist - I believe there is a God, but that this can never be known.
|
|||
Agnostic atheist - I believe there is no God, but that this can never be known.
|
|||
I am an ambivalent agnostic - I haven't decided yet.
|
|||
I am not an agnostic.
|
|
Make your pick! | next poll >> |
I deny the existence of God because I believe that religion, at its core, has been and always will be a political movement rather than a spiritual one. But at the same time, I am not so arrogant to think that my beliefs are absolute, or that my beliefs equate to knowledge that is applicable to anyone other than myself.
On a scale from one to ten of belief in God, I'm probably a two. I live my life on the assumption that God does not exist but I concede the possibility that He does.
:)
So yes, I believe She exists, but I admit that there's no way of knowing one way or the other. I just believe She does.
I'm pretty sure none of the world's religions are correct, though; at least, not entirely.
....
I DON'T KNOW!! XDD That's why I joined this spot! :P
Atheists and theists exhibit the height of arrogance when they claim to have examined all the evidence for God and found it positive or negative. In fact, it is a very rare atheist or a theist who has seriously considered any of the evidence for God. It would be more honest to be agnostic, saying one doesn't have enough evidence to believe in God, than to dishonestly claim to have examined all the evidence for God.
I, personally, found more proof that there is a God than that there isn't, I can see the evidence in nature. Though, it's only my opinion.
There is no explanation for the universe itself. Time, space, matter, and energy had a definite beginning in the Big Bang, about 14 billion years ago. The sudden arrival of the universe must mean that the universe was created by a timeless, immaterial intelligence. A natural cause requires time, space, matter, and energy. So, prove he doesn't exist? Possibly the only thing harder to do. Besides the enormity of the task, there's the fact that anyone who ever took a logic class knows and that is that you can't prove a negative. You can only prove (sometimes) that something hasn't happened YET. It may still the next time.
So... you have a theist, an atheist and an agnostic... None of them really knows the truth about the nature of existence. But only the agnostic is smart enough to admit it.
enregistre-toi ou rejoins fanpop pour ajouter ton commentaire