Do any of toi agree with bruno sammartino's decision about not wanting to be part of the wwe hall of fame?

I agree to some extent. I agree with the fact that he was wrestling in a time that was plus believable and less about storylines and theatrics. He held the titre for over eleven years on two runs as champion, and the titre doesnt mean as much as it used to when he was on top. I agree with him that vince has Lost what wrestling is all about. On the other hand, he was champion 2 times, both lengthy reigns, he had many memorable matches against some of the best in the business at that time, and the fact that he could sell out madison square garden night after night is really impressive and i personally think he should be in the wwe hall of fame. What do toi people think? Im in the middle of whether he should ou shouldnt.
 saiyajin1 posted il y a plus d’un an
next question »

wwe Réponses

LostPB said:
Its his decision.But I think somewhere down the road he might regret his decision.
select as best answer
posted il y a plus d’un an 
*
maybe. maybe not. he might think the hall of fame Lost its meaning just like "superstar" billy graham. who knows
saiyajin1 posted il y a plus d’un an
*
NO!!!!! He has the longest reigning wwe titre championship in history! If that were me, why the he k
riburns posted il y a plus d’un an
*
Why the heck would I not want to be. The hall of fame
riburns posted il y a plus d’un an
next question »