&& I don't think the imprinting is that bad. I mean at first not so much cause its like when Paul first saw two yr old Claire ((I don't think I'm using the right names)) he fell in love. But then its not that creepy I'm in l’amour with a 2 yr old && she can't l’amour nobody else love. It's plus like I l’amour her no matter what. I'm going to be there thru your ups and downs. && she's going to grow up to l’amour him
posted il y a plus d’un an
umm okay? that sounds weird 2 me. and no I don't think loups garous are bad they r the protectors they stop the human blood sucing vampires before they kill anyone. sure they imrint but its like jake a dit its not like what u think its like loving ur little sister then being her friend then when they r at a mature age they will rendez-vous amoureux, date and she will fall in l’amour with him cuz he his her other half he completes her and would do anything for her .. so I really don't think loups garous r bad at all! :)
People are saying that the loups garous are bad because they imprint onchildren, but listen to this... They Cannot help it, it's part of who they are, and if it happens, all they want for the child they imprint on is that they want them to be happy, they don't think about when the kid has grown up, like Jacob and Quil with Renesmee and Claire. I think it is quite unfair to ask this kind of question when some people will pick out the "bad" parts of loups garous like the "imprinting on children". so i'm going with... NO THEY AREN'T BAD!
posted il y a plus d’un an
I don't think they r bad either, and yeah i can understand how they can't help, which i find strangely romantic...
