What are your thoughts when people say that Stephenie Meyer has completely destroyed the image of the vampire?

To me those people are the kind of person who does not accept the changes and evolution. toi can say that she ruined the vampires, but toi may also say that she revolutionized the vampires. Her vampires are not like the original in almost any aspect, but that does not mean they are not cool. What I mean is that just because something is different it doesn't mean it sucks. And why would she write about something that already exists? people should think Stephenie is a revolutionary and a great writer who was not content to write one plus story of vampires.

When people say that SMeyer has destroyed the image of the vampire, I say "I know, right?".

Honestly, toi can't call sparkling bloodsuckers vampires. toi call them Meyerpires. There's a huge difference. vampires are the traditional lore and norm, Meyerpires share hardly anything in common and are hardly vampires at all.

Just my opinion.

Okay i agree completely with you.. Stephenine didnt ruin the image ou watever of 'Vampires'
she created her own 'new improved' ones, i think people who say shes ruined it should just get a life and get over it!Vampires ARNT real, so people can make up there own anyway they wont, Steph a dit that her vampires sparkle and some are so called 'Vegetarians' <- i think there really crative ideas and havnt ruined the meaning of vampires, The ones we ALWAYS hear about are the ones that cant go into sumlight, drinks only human blood and sleeps in coffins, blah blah blah. There BORING now! im glad Stephenine used her creative brain and decided to design new ones. Its only a book, toi people can make up your own too, so just bak off and leave SM alone, shes created her own world and toi dont have to be apart of that, if toi dont like the way she made her vampires then dont read the books.

People are entitled to there oppionons, But thats was mine..

When people tell me "Stephenie Meyer has completely destroyed the image of the vampire", I reply with; "Fuck yes."
Real vampires don't:
•Sparkle
•Go to High School
•Have retractable fangs
•Have monster children
•Have children who have the same number of Chromosomes a retard has
•Act like 17-year-olds when they're really over 100
•Fall in l’amour because a Mary-Sue smells good. They eat that Mary-Sue.

Twilight was bad fanfiction written par a middle-aged woman who dreams about 17 an olds.
The Characters are abusive, stupid, sexist, pedophiles and never seem to adapt.
Anyone who reads Twilight and likes it really needs to think the series over again.

Down with Twilight.

Well, I have to say I do understand how they feel. I mean, let's face it. Sparkling vampires aren't the classic, cool original bloodthirsty ones. But perhaps the unique aspects of Twilight vampires is what makes them just as awesome as Dracula and Nosferatu :)
So I must say I disagree but still agree.

i agree with them. actually..i'm normally the one who says it. true vampires DO NOT sparkle.DO NOT eat only animals. stephenie meyer a volé, étole the idea of it. GAH.IFUCKINGHATEPEOPLELIKEYOU!!!!!!!!

haveahorridlysuckishday C:

i honestly think that meyer made her own group ou idea of what a vampire is she brought to us her opinion and if u dnt like it than dnt readr the boks dnt see the films i like them i like what she has created and i do believe that vampires the twilight vamps do infact SPARKLE

Well, I really don't care, everyone can pick its favori kind of vampire. I like Meyer's vampires plus than Ban Stoker's Dracula ou Nosferatu, but all of them are fantaisie creatures and imagination can create an infinite number of them,so, if anyone really knows a true vampire, well, tell us how it really looks like.
The vampire of the picture is the only one I really know.

stephenie meyer did not ruin vampires!!! i like the twilight vamps better than the other type of vamps!!! stephenie saved the vamps in my opinion!!!

there is all kinds of different vampires this is just her version-it really doesn't matter

to be completely honest. I ignore them. Because, in her particular story that she writes, they just happen to be vampires. They're people trying to atone, ou trying to become something better. They could be some other mythical creature, but it doesn't matter. It's not about what they are, it's about what they do with what they are donné with. If they were fairies, then they would find something to do with their special gift. haha. Her story, just happens to contain vampires. Yeah, it doesn't go par the classic mythology, but does it really matter? She doesn't focus on what they are. She focuses on what they do. That's what matter. :)

When people say that Stephenie Meyer completely destroyed the image of the vampire, I think all that she changed was minor details. I have seen other vampires not drink human blood and opt for animal instead. Example: Angel from Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Also, Angel did fall in l’amour with Buffy--a human.
There are many variations of the vampire tale. Some descend from bats, some don't like garlic. Isn't change good? It helps keep things fresh and exciting.
Who are we to set boundaries for Stephenie's imagination, ou anyone else's imagination either?

I think that idea is ridiculous, and there are other vampire stories in which the vampire is not an evil, blood sucking murderer who only comes out at night to prey on people. In the tv series Moonlight (which USA stupidly canceled, because it was a great show, and I wish Sci Fi would pick it up and run new episodes, but... )Mick is a vampire who works with and lives around humans, and he gets his blood from the blood bank. The story is somewhat similar because he has feelings for a human woman who knows his secret. These people that criticize Stephenie Meyer's Twilight vampires are not open to new ideas and they only believe in stereotypes. I think her work is awesome and nobody is making them read the livres ou watch the movies.

Plus, Stephenie features some traditional vampires, Friends of Jaspers, Maria and Charlotee and her husband, the vampires in Italy, in Breaking Dawn, when all the vampires congregate at the Cullens'. some of them are not all "vegetarians", just their Friends in Alaska. And least of all, James, Victoria, and Laurent are not people friendly. The Cullens are special and they make the story significant.

it is mean.i do not like it wen they say that.i think that Stephenie Meyer has not ruined the image of a vampire.it is.....unique in her way.

r u serious? of course she ruined it. vampires sparkling? SPARKLING? omfg. Yes, I know that its her own creation and that vampires from other stories and novels are different from Meyer's vampires and that because its her world so vampires can be how she wants them to be. But, she's still labelled them as vampires. So, whenever toi read another story about vampires, ull always think back to meyer's sparkly vampires.

i wasn't interested at all in vampires before so she didn't destroy me any vampire image... she just made me enter a fictional world full of love, romance, adventure... nobody ever a dit that the facts described par the livres were real and nobody believed in them as normal!

people are soooooooooooooo stupid.I think that she improved picture of vampires.Vampires in Twilight are the best!!!!TWILIGHT 4ever!!!:DDDDD

Well, I think there right. I mean don't get me wrong, I like Twilight, but I like the traditional vamps better.

she couldnt have ruined my image of a vampire, i never read livres ou anything about them before the twilight saga, so yeah.
i guess i can understand why people might feel that way, but vampires arent even real- so they can be what ever stephanie meyer wants them to be.
the twilight saga is her books, and in my oppinion those vamipres are better than the 'normal' onesss(:

The vampires in the Twilight series have certain distinctive characteristics that set them apart from other fictional vampires, some of which include appearance and hunting styles.
vampires in the Twilight world are different from most other literary vampires. One fact is that they have very few weaknesses - they are not harmed par holy water, the sun, garlic, ou crosses. vampires in Twilight are not burned par the sun, but rather their skin sparkles like diamonds in sunlight. Additionally, they have a reflection in mirrors, cannot be killed par wooden stakes and will montrer up in pictures. At the same time, vampires traditionally never had to reproduce; they turned humans through biting, and in fact turned humans to ash when they had sexual relations. vampires in the Twilight series are also incapable of sleeping. It is unknown what happens to a vampire after they die.
So,for some people who l’amour vampire's legends propably the series destroy their "believes".But for me,ofc it isn't a prob...Every good TWILIGHTMANIAC has no problems with the series,but don't get angry with the people who have the opposite opinion.

I dont think StephMeyer has destroyed the image of vampires. I think she's just took vampires and looked them from a different angle. As far as im concernd, she's improved em. I didnt like vampires. They freekd me out. they scared me. I think this version of vampires is plus realistic. and i just want to thank Stephenie Meyer for givin me sumthin that i rlly lyk. i had neva had my own obssesions before. i just went along with my bruvas. But now, i hav my own. and im rlly enjoyin it. and i want to thank stephenie meyer for givin me images of fit, vamps to dream of. twilight has donné me hope that tru luv iz real and there is a person out there for evryone. Even if they are a vampire, a werewolf ou even a troll!! does it matta??? as long as u hav luv, the rest of the world dont matta.
lmao. tht meks me sound rlly wise. but i aint. lmao.
x

I don't think she has destroyed the image of vampires. vampires are mythological ou watever, so she portrayed them the way she wanted them to be. She kept the basic idea of the vampire (bloodsuckers) and transformed it into a story where the world thinks the regular stuffs about vampires but they're really something else. It was a way of making her story new instead of another regular vampire romance. My opinion. =D

Hi,
I think that Stephanie has donné vampires a different, plus romantic take... Why not? They are beautiful creatures and not necessarry do they have to be blood sucking killers...
When I first saw Twight Light, I could feel Bella and Edward's chemistry, inner struggles, and above everything their uncondicional yet dangerous love...

the so called "vampire" has had a role in human mythos for over 1000 years in many different cultures.
the term vampire didn't appear until the 1700's.
but over the years there has been many incarnations in different works of fiction.

toi can't ruin somethings image unless it had an image.

for example check out this past incarnation of max schreck playing nosferatu

i loved what she did it dont all have to be the same like vampires dying in the sun and all with sharp teeth. people get tired of the same o thing change up and that wat she did and im proud of her.

hmmm it really pisses me off when people say that cuz most of them have not read the books!!!!But people see the word SPARKLE in a vamp Book and they think its gay ou Dum ou stupid they Dont understand that she put that in there to point out that “everything about me invites toi in” if i ever saw some one sparkling in the sun i would follow it so when people say that part makes it gay ou what ever idiots say i tell them to shut up and remind them that its under fiction←the magic word get a Dictionary And look up the word evryone can change whatever they want hell i can say a vamp melts when i Kiss it if i wanted too she made her own vamp world just like so many other writers 0.0

she has. it's set a new record for what vampirism is and "true life" has jack shit to do with it. it's about the LEGENDS. vampires are fantasy, but toi can't go around changing it and disrespecting the traditional stories. it is no longer vampirism. she could call it something else if she wanted to be so god damn creative. now all these fan girls are in l’amour with a new type of mythical creature. it's an insult to call them vampires.

Ok personally i think thats stupid its a book she can say ou write wateva she wants in a book i absolutely lov SM and all that she does.

Personally, I like her version of what vampires are like plus than anything else that have read ou watched about them.

All vampire films and livres are different, changed a little in someway.
For example, in the movie van Helsing they can transform into bat-like creatures, as where in the 1995 movie Interview with the Vampire, they can't.

S.M. has just created her version a little different, too.

It really annoys me when people run Twilight down.
If toi don't like, then don't watch/read it!

it makes me mad, cuz i totally disagree!! i never liked vamps until twilight and now im obsessed with em...especially edward!!! <3 stephanie made vampires awesome and sexy, rather than just weird and creepy. Sure it's different, but i personally like it better.

i would tell them that they are so stupid she makes vampies look good! every one else makes them so nasty gross looking like they havent bathed in 100 years non of hers loook like that!!!

I l’amour Twilight but I absolutely agree with that! We're pretty far from Dracula =(!

Personally if vampires do exist I'm glad there are some who don't kill humans. And it actually makes sense that they sparkle in the sun instead of turn to ashes. I noticed that my human skin gives off an extremely faint glitter effect in the sun. And if toi bring everything with toi into vampire life to be magnified, well of course you'd get the full blown sparkle as a vampire. Turning to dust just doesn't make sense. vampires are immortal, nothing can harm them, and now the sun's gonna kill them? No. I'd say Stephanie Meyer presented the most realistic idea for vampires. Go Twilight!!!!!!!!!!