What is your option on people comparing HP and Twilight?

I don't mind it. livres are compared to each other all the time.

I think some people (real critics) are plus comparing their impacts, rather than the actual text.

It fails. They almost have the same things, fictional, fantasy, deaths, and long books.

I think it give the HP fans a reason to dislike us even more

I think its fine to a point.. I mean its fine to compare and have small debates, but then again, there are some people who take debating to an extreme! They get so caught up in which book they like better, that they don't care what they say.. So really in my opinion, I don't really like it! Mostly because of what it leads to.. But then again, thats just meh! :)Anyone agree?

While they are both fantaisie stories, they're different types of fantasy. One is vampire/werewolf, the other is wizard/witch. And completely different things happen in them.

Debating is fine . . . to a certain limit. But when people take it to the extremes, that's when debating becomes a problem.

Well, it's annoying.

I mean, they're NOTHING alike.
vampires vs Wizards, there isn't a vampire in HP and there's no wizard in Twilight.