Do toi think Gale should have been in the hunger games ou Peeta?

Gale coz he'd just fucking kill everyone else and they could déplacer on without a revolution.

it would make for a very interesting story but it would be drastically different.

Peeta

Gale would have a better chance of surviving than Peeta, because of his hunting/snare-making skills, but I also think he'd be too similar to Katniss. It'd get boring. I also doubt he'd think of admitting to Ceasar that he loves Katniss, so toi wouldn't have the whole story development (assuming that was Peeta's own idea, and nothing to do with Haymitch).

I think Peeta because then there would be no revolution, which some people seem to like. I find that the revolution not happening would be terrible. The corruption throughout the country is severe and needs to be eliminated, par not wanting the revolution to happen, toi are implying that it is okay for a country to be tyrannical and kill their young.

I don't know. He would have a better chance of surviving in the wild. But . . . he never struck me as possessing Peeta's talent for appealing to the public.

And who knows how the story would have turned out if he had been called for the 74th Games.

Peeta obvi otherwhise the story would be completely different and THG should neva b changed cos its 2 good already

Gale