Which is the truth?(Caution! really long)Part1

Of course, we all l’amour the Disney peter pan. I for one l’amour the squeal to the Disney Peter Pan, but are they true is the question. When James Barrie wrote peter pan it was more...cynical. Meaning it was gorier and had plus emotions put into to it than the way Disney put it. If toi haven't seen the peter pan movie in 2003. Well toi are missing sum details. In the 2003 movie, instead of Wendy just falling when tinker cloche, bell tells the Lost boys to shoot her down. One of the Lost boys strikes her in the cœur, coeur and kills her. When peter finds out, the Lost boy that shot her was afraid and said," Do it peter if toi have to." While have his chemise pulled down to montrer his heart. Peter was ready and willing to kill one of his own Lost boys. Which is what was written in the original tale of peter pan.
Another one that was written in the original was killing of Captain Hook. Yes, before anyone say, “But hook is evil and creepy and should die." Yes, that very well may be true, but even though Hook is bad. He really shouldn't deserve to die. Think about it. Without Hook, peter wouldn't have anyone to fight. There really wouldn't be any films ou an antagonist to the story. Again, in the 2003 movie, instead of Peter moralizing his death ou feeling bad. He stood there almost having a smile. When he died all the Lost boys (including the darlings) laughed and a dit hooray.