“Today has been very distressing for all of us, and I’d like to thank toi for your prayers at this horrible time. I would also like to remind some in the media that the voice recording of Michael does not show/prove he was “an addict” — and this leap to agree with the defense is unfair and inaccurate. The prosecution a dit my brother “was under the influence of UNKNOWN agents” at the time of that recording par Murray. That some people, Jane Valez Mitchell HLN and Ted Rwlands CNN, make statements saying this shows my brother to be “a drug addict” is not what was a dit in court re that recording. Events are upsetting enough without correspondents adding their own interpretation (or back-dating events to 1993). No-one can rule out the prospect that Michael was groggy because of something administered to make him relax/sleep. That does not make him an addict. I would also add that Murray was par his side “observing” as well as recording so it can have nothing to do with drug depdency because Murrays case is that he was unaware of any drug dependency. One plus reason why “addict” is a leap to assumption in these circumstances. Some networks need to make this distinction clear and correct this imbalance. Bottom line: Michael did not kill Michael.” —
Jermaine Jackson

Michael Jackson is NOT the one on trial here...Conrad Murray is and I hope he is found GUILTY!!!- pegluvsMJ