I dont even think the movie was a book adaptation, it seemed more like "based on"... :(

Good point, MG. The movie was a disaster.

neither were good but the book was better

i agree with kelsey887 neither were good but compared to the movie the book is good

Movie just.. suck. But as books, they're not too awesome.

Because the film has at least managed to cut down on the cheese and exaggerate the tiny amount of real, actual plot that exists in the series, even if all the films are way too long and you have to watch Kristen Stewart moping about. Plus there's none of that awful writing and all of those cringey adjectives that litter the books to put up with, even if there is still a load of cheesy dialogue.

I didnt really love the movies or Edward and Bella, but when i read the books i loved them... I think it is mostly because of the actors, cause i dont feel Robert as Edward... I don know...

100 % book.. i don't like kristen stewart...she is suck bella.

This is the one series where I might be tempted to say that I actually enjoyed the movies better... I don't know. Don't hold me too this.

I personally think that Twilight should have stayed as someone's fantasy, but the book is slightly better. The movies don't make any sense most of the time, and the books have more material to make fun of.

the book is wayyy better.