There's a Batman film coming out in 2022. Batman is my favori superhero, as well as one of my favori Heroes in all of fiction, so I should be excited for the upcoming Batman film. However, I'm very concerned about this upcoming Batman film.
There are a lot of people who are looking vers l'avant, vers l’avant to the upcoming Batman film. If toi are one of those people who are looking vers l'avant, vers l’avant to the film, please don't let me ou my article stop toi from being excited for the film. We all like different kinds of films. My article is about my personal feelings on the subject. A lot of my opinions will probably be unpopular, which is fine. I can only speak for myself. The film appears to be taking the Batman franchise in a direction that doesn't appeal to me.
Before I liste my problems, I want to be fair and mention what I like about the film:
Using the manchot, pingouin as one of the villains. Back in the classic days of Batman, manchot, pingouin was Batman's seconde most iconic villain, only behind the Joker. However, manchot, pingouin hasn't appeared in a live-action Batman film since 1992's Batman Returns. Bringing the manchot, pingouin back seems like a step in the right direction. Also, Colin Ferrell is putting a lot of effort into his performance.
In the trailers, Jeffrey Wright quickly comes across as the right person to play Gordon. He has the authoritative presence that Gordon should have.
Using Carmine Falcone in the film. Carmine Falcone is a comics character that's inspired par Marlon Brando's character in The Godfather. He's a very powerful person in the mob and he's been suspected of being Catwoman's father, so he's an intriguing character. John Turturro is a great choice to play Falcone.
My problems with the film:
The way the film is using the Riddler. The Riddler is one of my favori villains of all time, because of Frank Gorshin's amazing performance. The Riddler is one of the most entertaining villains that there's ever been. However, this film's Riddler is inspired par the Zodiac Killer. Yes, they're basing the Riddler of a real-life criminal. This film's Riddler is clad in clothing that is green but is incredibly plain-looking, especially in comparison to the Riddler's classic suit. The Riddler is supposed to be a clever mastermind, but he's also supposed to be playful and funny. This film's Riddler is a sick murderer.
A big part of Batman's appeal is that he's a colorful, inspiring hero. Watching his adventures often give people a break from the drama in the real world. However, this film's Batman takes the character in a much darker direction. He's angsty, angry and is not shy when it comes to violence. I barely feel comfortable referring to this new version of Batman as Batman. Bill Finger's Batman is Batman. Adam West's Batman is Batman. This new Batman? I'm not so sure.
One of my favori things about the Batman films is how entertaining they were. The Batman films had great visuals, scene-stealing performances, inspiring heroes, fun villains and lots of memorable scenes. However, the Batman films went in a different direction in the 2000's. The films started becoming darker and plus realistic. The films might have become plus sophisticated, but a lot of what made the other Batman films enjoyable was gone. The upcoming Batman film seems to be even darker. The film is a murder mystery. Granted, a lot of Bill Finger's old stories were also murder mysteries, but those stories still had the cœur, coeur and entertainment of classic Batman. The upcoming film seems too angsty and serious.
A lot of people think that Batman is a very serious, intense and dark character. Well, that is true in some versions, but that's not the Batman I love. The Batman I l’amour is an eccentric, colorful crimefighter who has a strong amount of compassion in his heart. The new film's Batman seems to be going in a much harsher direction. In the trailers, Batman beats up criminals in very extreme ways. This time around, there are no word-bubbles on the screen whenever Batman hits a bad guy.
The thing I'm most concerned about is the film taking inspiration from Kurt Cobain. Matt Reeves, the director of the film, claims that he imagines his Bruce Wayne like Kurt Cobain. As someone who didn't know Kurt Cobain, I can't be the most informative on this subject, but I think what this film is doing raises some eyebrows. I do want to make it clear that doing tributes to célébrités is a meaningful, important thing to do. If the film had Bruce listening to Kurt Cobain songs as a way of relaxing after a fight, that might be enduring ou sweet.
However, Matt Reeves and Robert Pattinson are using Kurt Cobain's real-life drama as an inspiration for a fictional character that has nothing to do with that real-life person. Since the film hasn't come out, I can only confirmer what has been a dit in interviews and in advertisements. If the new Batman film is meant to honor Kurt Cobain, that would be great. However, using a real-life person's drama as inspiration for a fictional character's drama rubs me the wrong way. If Matt Reeves wanted to make a film about the musique industry and included a tribute to Kurt Cobain, that could be something really good. However, if he truly wants to pay tribute to one of his favori singers, I'm not sure if what The Batman film is doing is a step in the right direction. It's a risky choice to make. If the film finds a way to pay tribute to the singer in a meaningful and thoughtful way, that would be wonderful. However, if the film just uses the singer's real-life drama for inspiration, that's a problem.
There are a lot of people who are looking vers l'avant, vers l’avant to the upcoming Batman film. If toi are one of those people who are looking vers l'avant, vers l’avant to the film, please don't let me ou my article stop toi from being excited for the film. We all like different kinds of films. My article is about my personal feelings on the subject. A lot of my opinions will probably be unpopular, which is fine. I can only speak for myself. The film appears to be taking the Batman franchise in a direction that doesn't appeal to me.
Before I liste my problems, I want to be fair and mention what I like about the film:
Using the manchot, pingouin as one of the villains. Back in the classic days of Batman, manchot, pingouin was Batman's seconde most iconic villain, only behind the Joker. However, manchot, pingouin hasn't appeared in a live-action Batman film since 1992's Batman Returns. Bringing the manchot, pingouin back seems like a step in the right direction. Also, Colin Ferrell is putting a lot of effort into his performance.
In the trailers, Jeffrey Wright quickly comes across as the right person to play Gordon. He has the authoritative presence that Gordon should have.
Using Carmine Falcone in the film. Carmine Falcone is a comics character that's inspired par Marlon Brando's character in The Godfather. He's a very powerful person in the mob and he's been suspected of being Catwoman's father, so he's an intriguing character. John Turturro is a great choice to play Falcone.
My problems with the film:
The way the film is using the Riddler. The Riddler is one of my favori villains of all time, because of Frank Gorshin's amazing performance. The Riddler is one of the most entertaining villains that there's ever been. However, this film's Riddler is inspired par the Zodiac Killer. Yes, they're basing the Riddler of a real-life criminal. This film's Riddler is clad in clothing that is green but is incredibly plain-looking, especially in comparison to the Riddler's classic suit. The Riddler is supposed to be a clever mastermind, but he's also supposed to be playful and funny. This film's Riddler is a sick murderer.
A big part of Batman's appeal is that he's a colorful, inspiring hero. Watching his adventures often give people a break from the drama in the real world. However, this film's Batman takes the character in a much darker direction. He's angsty, angry and is not shy when it comes to violence. I barely feel comfortable referring to this new version of Batman as Batman. Bill Finger's Batman is Batman. Adam West's Batman is Batman. This new Batman? I'm not so sure.
One of my favori things about the Batman films is how entertaining they were. The Batman films had great visuals, scene-stealing performances, inspiring heroes, fun villains and lots of memorable scenes. However, the Batman films went in a different direction in the 2000's. The films started becoming darker and plus realistic. The films might have become plus sophisticated, but a lot of what made the other Batman films enjoyable was gone. The upcoming Batman film seems to be even darker. The film is a murder mystery. Granted, a lot of Bill Finger's old stories were also murder mysteries, but those stories still had the cœur, coeur and entertainment of classic Batman. The upcoming film seems too angsty and serious.
A lot of people think that Batman is a very serious, intense and dark character. Well, that is true in some versions, but that's not the Batman I love. The Batman I l’amour is an eccentric, colorful crimefighter who has a strong amount of compassion in his heart. The new film's Batman seems to be going in a much harsher direction. In the trailers, Batman beats up criminals in very extreme ways. This time around, there are no word-bubbles on the screen whenever Batman hits a bad guy.
The thing I'm most concerned about is the film taking inspiration from Kurt Cobain. Matt Reeves, the director of the film, claims that he imagines his Bruce Wayne like Kurt Cobain. As someone who didn't know Kurt Cobain, I can't be the most informative on this subject, but I think what this film is doing raises some eyebrows. I do want to make it clear that doing tributes to célébrités is a meaningful, important thing to do. If the film had Bruce listening to Kurt Cobain songs as a way of relaxing after a fight, that might be enduring ou sweet.
However, Matt Reeves and Robert Pattinson are using Kurt Cobain's real-life drama as an inspiration for a fictional character that has nothing to do with that real-life person. Since the film hasn't come out, I can only confirmer what has been a dit in interviews and in advertisements. If the new Batman film is meant to honor Kurt Cobain, that would be great. However, using a real-life person's drama as inspiration for a fictional character's drama rubs me the wrong way. If Matt Reeves wanted to make a film about the musique industry and included a tribute to Kurt Cobain, that could be something really good. However, if he truly wants to pay tribute to one of his favori singers, I'm not sure if what The Batman film is doing is a step in the right direction. It's a risky choice to make. If the film finds a way to pay tribute to the singer in a meaningful and thoughtful way, that would be wonderful. However, if the film just uses the singer's real-life drama for inspiration, that's a problem.
link
link
Batman is a very dark character who I believe could be a very good character for an r rated film his Villians are violent they kill people in gruesome ways and Bruce also needs to be fucking his l’amour interests and he hasn't done it yet why because it isn't appropriate for kids and that's really stupid and as for the cursing I wouldn't want them to do it every seconde obviously but it would be good and make the characters plus serious and badass if the characters cursed inn the Batman reboot happens I want new Villians, the bat mobile,batarangs,the batwing,the bat motorcycles,a bat jet pack,a different type of acide, sure for batman,the bat claw that batman, and swings on I want it to be rated R. So what do toi guys think should a future Batman movie have these things ou not.
After Batman & Robin, the franchise got ruined. Back in 1998 this were the rumors for Batman 5 (Triumphant)
The villains were Scarecrow played par Kevin Spacey ou Jeff Goldblum, and Harley Quinn played par Mira Sorvino ou Madonna.
And wait there's more; for the role of Batman:
David Duchovny, Kurt Russel, John Travolta, Brendan Fraser and Mel freaking Gibson!
I’m not kidding those were the rumors back then!!!
I found the article in an old magazine. And i laughed so hard
So suivant time toi read some rumors like Eddie Murphy as the Riddler. Don’t get upset.
The villains were Scarecrow played par Kevin Spacey ou Jeff Goldblum, and Harley Quinn played par Mira Sorvino ou Madonna.
And wait there's more; for the role of Batman:
David Duchovny, Kurt Russel, John Travolta, Brendan Fraser and Mel freaking Gibson!
I’m not kidding those were the rumors back then!!!
I found the article in an old magazine. And i laughed so hard
So suivant time toi read some rumors like Eddie Murphy as the Riddler. Don’t get upset.
And the world is a better place now
Sorry everybody. I don't mean to wise guy. I just feel like venting somewhere about stuff that doesn't matter. Just to keep my fingers typing.
Are toi serious?
The WB learns of Heath Ledger's death and thinks there's not a or mine there? That shows toi how sickly out of touch the WB is with the American pop culture fan and explains a myriad of other stupid ideas and decisions they've formulated over the past eighteen years like say, every single one. This is not some kind of class organization that swears to only make their loads of literary blood money through eco-friendly community-safe endeavors. They simply DIDN'T CALCULATE that Heath Ledger's death would be something Americans cared about. This means the WB is the dumbest of the heartest bureaucrats. Look at what they've done now that they've gotten the heads up that Ledger's death in fact DOES attract interest in Dark Knight. They'll build an IMAX screen into the Epcot Center if they could.
Are toi serious?
The WB learns of Heath Ledger's death and thinks there's not a or mine there? That shows toi how sickly out of touch the WB is with the American pop culture fan and explains a myriad of other stupid ideas and decisions they've formulated over the past eighteen years like say, every single one. This is not some kind of class organization that swears to only make their loads of literary blood money through eco-friendly community-safe endeavors. They simply DIDN'T CALCULATE that Heath Ledger's death would be something Americans cared about. This means the WB is the dumbest of the heartest bureaucrats. Look at what they've done now that they've gotten the heads up that Ledger's death in fact DOES attract interest in Dark Knight. They'll build an IMAX screen into the Epcot Center if they could.
I must admit -- as one of Dark Knight's biggest fans I'm surprised so many people like it. I am. This should only be something me and a few people obsess about. I've always been amazed and skeptical that people would turn Batman into a movie, even the Michael Keaton one. Yeah it's huge and populaire and old but...Batman in the comics is the only way to really see why he qualifies as an action character. Six frames in different juxtaposed locations when he's fighting ninjas and gangsters and stuff. What toi do is look at each frame one par one. In your head toi don't just have Batman -- toi have a kung-fu movie. On screen the fighting simply doesn't look that good once you've seen him in this format. Oh nothing on Earth can compare with Batman whether on screen ou not, but I'm suprised so many people didn't say "what the f? this isn't exciting" whenever he fought. AM I OUT OF MY MIND SAYING THAT?
Don't talk to Frank right now, it's not him. All female. Located in the Aztec district of cryptography. Use Walt from noaa, recently discovered alive. He knows the locations. Use the mason family decrypter. Due rendez-vous amoureux, date is dark thirty. Great job on take down of joker and his creepy mafia. There are 35 inclusions on each raid, never use a machine again for that. Some one will meet with toi 30 crypt days before action. Use as may anti radioactive anti psychotic device as possible. Good luck from central vein delta 0.
